Reconciling Deeds with Field Evidence

Overview

Reconciling recorded descriptions with field evidence is at the heart of boundary surveying. This process requires understanding of legal principles, historical context, and systematic analysis.

Learning Objectives

• Compare deed descriptions with field conditions
• Apply reconciliation principles
• Resolve discrepancies appropriately
• Document reconciliation process

Key Concepts

Comparison Process

Steps in reconciliation:

1. Plot deed description
2. Locate called monuments
3. Measure actual conditions
4. Identify discrepancies
5. Analyze causes of differences
6. Apply appropriate principles

Discrepancy Types

Common reconciliation issues:

• Distance discrepancies
• Bearing/direction differences
• Missing or moved monuments
• Inconsistent adjoiner calls
• Area vs. perimeter conflicts

Resolution Approaches

Methods for reconciliation:

• Follow monuments when consistent
• Prorate minor discrepancies
• Apply hierarchy of calls
• Consider original survey intent
• Evaluate historical accuracy

Documentation

Recording reconciliation:

• Comparison summary
• Discrepancy analysis
• Resolution rationale
• Supporting evidence
• Professional opinion

Key Terms

• Reconciliation: Process of resolving record/ground differences
• Proration: Distribution of discrepancy proportionally
• Intent: The purpose of the original conveyance

Practice Questions

1. How should a surveyor handle a situation where measured distances differ from deed calls?
2. What factors are considered when determining original survey intent?

Based on CalTrans LS/LSIT Video Exam Preparation Course materials.